Saturday, October 19, 2013

The Closing Bell

The Closing Bell

10/19/13

Statistical Summary

   Current Economic Forecast

           
            2013

Real Growth in Gross Domestic Product:                        +1.0-+2.0
                        Inflation (revised):                                                              1.5-2.5
Growth in Corporate Profits:                                   0-7%

            2014 estimates

                        Real Growth in Gross Domestic Product                       +1.5-+2.5
                        Inflation (revised)                                                             1.5-2.5
                        Corporate Profits                                                              5-10%

   Current Market Forecast
           
            Dow Jones Industrial Average

                                    Current Trend (revised):  
                                    Short Term Trading Range                      14190-15550
Intermediate Uptrend                              15092-20092
Long Term Trading Range                       4918-17000
                                               
                        2013    Year End Fair Value                                     11590-11610

                  2014    Year End Fair Value                                     11800-12000                                          

            Standard & Poor’s 500

                                    Current Trend (revised):
                                    Short Term Uptrend                               1685-1839
                                    Intermediate Term Uptrend                       1606-2192 
                                    Long Term Trading Range                         715-1800
                                                           
                        2013    Year End Fair Value                                      1430-1450

                        2014   Year End Fair Value                                       1470-1490         

Percentage Cash in Our Portfolios

Dividend Growth Portfolio                              43%
            High Yield Portfolio                                        46%
            Aggressive Growth Portfolio                           43%

Economics/Politics
           
The economy is a modest positive for Your Money.   Under normal circumstances there wouldn’t have been a good deal of economic data this week; but with the government shutdown, there was even less.  Nonetheless what we got was basically mixed: positives---weekly mortgage applications and the Philly Fed index; negatives---weekly purchase applications, weekly jobless claims and the October NY Fed manufacturing index; neutral---weekly retail sales and the Fed Beige Book.  As you can see, there is not enough here to be any kind of tell on our forecast.

Not that the stats were all that important this week---the dominating event being the negotiations over the budget resolution/debt ceiling.  As expected, these issues got resolved in the eleventh hour and were more of the same kick-the-can-down-the-road solutions that leave the government in business but provide nothing for you and me.

I think that the key takeaway from this episode will be the impact this three week, three ring circus has had on business and consumer confidence.  After all, had it not been for the ingenuity and hard work of American businesses and consumers, this economy would be flat on its face having to deal with irresponsible monetary and fiscal policies.  So that confidence may be the most important factor in moving the economy forward at this moment.  In any case, signs of it or lack thereof will show up soon, particularly as we get into the Holiday spending season.

I added (above) our 2014 forecast for the economy and year end Fair Value.   These numbers reflect one basic underlying premise; and that is that nothing has changed.  Our fiscal woes are not going to get solved until the personnel in Washington changes.  Hence, government policies (too much spending, too much regulation and too high taxes) will continue to act as a headwind.  And largely because of that, monetary policy is apt to remain overly easy, raising the stakes when, as and if the Fed begins a transition.

In short, our forecast remains unaltered and is not likely to change for the foreseeable future, barring a complete loss of confidence by business and consumers:

a below average secular rate of recovery resulting from too much government spending, too much government debt to service, too much government regulation, a financial system with an impaired balance sheet. and a business community unwilling to hire and invest because the aforementioned along with...... the historic inability of the Fed to properly time the reversal of a vastly over expansive  monetary policy.
                       
        The pluses:

(1)   our improving energy picture.  The US is awash in cheap, clean burning natural gas.... In addition to making home heating more affordable, low cost, abundant energy serves to draw those manufacturers back to the US who are facing rising foreign labor costs and relying on energy resources that carry negative political risks. 


       The negatives:

(1) a vulnerable global banking system.  At the beginning of every week, I think that surely there will be nothing write about in this section this time around; but then like clockwork another bankster fraud plot comes to light.  This week, [guess who?] a JP Morgan trader is being investigate for currency manipulation.  He is rumored to be part of a group known affectionately as The Bandits.

For the second act, Goldman persuaded [muscled?] the NY Fed to fire an examiner for ratting them out.

      And:

      Knowing too much can be dangerous (medium and today’s must read):

‘My concern here.....that: [a] investors ultimately lose confidence in our financial institutions and refuse to invest in America and [b] the recent scandals are simply signs that our banks are not as sound and well managed as we have been led to believe and, hence, are highly vulnerable to future shocks, particularly a collapse of the EU financial system.’
     
(2)   fiscal policy.  What can you say about a bunch of guys who are elected to do the right thing for the country, are way over paid for it and yet can’t do something simple like create a budget for a record five years in a row?  The answer is, nothing good.

Amazingly, after all the turmoil, fiscal policy is just as f**ked up now as it was three weeks ago.  No, I take that back; it is worse because these thieves managed to attach several new pork barrel spending earmarks to the supposedly ‘clean budget/debt ceiling’ bill.  Great work.  How can you not want to throw every last one of them out?

        So here we are with too much spending, too high taxes, too much regulation and the prospect of facing another shutdown/default battle in three months.  In short, fiscal policy remains a headwind and will likely remain that way until at least November 2014.  The $64,000 question is, did this latest circus and the prospect for another in early 2014 do enough damage to business and consumer confidence to have a material impact on the economy?

        I include in each Closing Bell a lament regarding the potential impact that higher interest rates [potentially the result of either tapering or the inability to reach an agreement on the debt ceiling] will have on the budget deficit.    As I have noted previously, the US government’s debt has grown to such a size that its interest cost is now a major budget line item---and that is with rates at/near historic lows.  Moreover, government debt continues to increase and the lion’s share of this new debt is being bought by the Fed. 

So the risk here is two fold: [a] to the Fed---its balance sheet is levered to the point that Lehman Bros. looks like it was an AAA credit.  So if interest rates go up {and prices go down}, the very thin equity piece of the balance sheet would disappear.  The Fed would then be technically bankrupt. and [b] to the Treasury---it must pay the interest charges.  Hence, if rates go up, the interest costs to the government go up; and if they go up a lot, then this budget line item will explode and make all the more difficult any vow to reduce government spending as a percent of GDP.....
                  
(3)   the potential negative impact of central bank money printing:  The key point here is that [a] the Fed has inflated bank reserves far beyond any comparable level in history and [b] while this hasn’t been an economic problem to date, {i} it still has to withdraw all those reserves from the system without creating any disruptions---a task that I regularly point out it has proven inept at in the past and {ii} it has created or is creating asset bubbles in the stock market as well as in the auto, student and mortgage loan markets. 

With Janet Yellen now scheduled to assume the Fed chief mantle, general consensus is that the current QEInfinity is apt to go on for some at least another six months; and if the fallout from the latest battle over the budget/debt ceiling is big enough, it could continue even longer.  That in turn leaves [a] the Fed with the necessity of tapering but with an even more bloated  balance sheet and [b] us stuck with {i} the risks that they will botch  up the transition from easy to tight money---as they have on every prior occasion and {ii} the continuing misallocation of capital,  hardship to savers, encouragement to speculators that result in distortions to our economy, i.e. slow growth and high unemployment.                   http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2013/10/18/our_great_conundrum_an_unbroken_string_of_inflation_100674.html


Charting the Fed’s failure (short):

Lacy Hunt on Fed policy (medium and an absolute must read):

(4) a blow up in the Middle EastWhile the carnage in Syria continues, that is not the current problem.  The issue now is does Obama let the Iranians lure Him into to some deal that enhances His world leadership role but only in His own mind while they drive for the hoop [nuclear bomb].   The immediate risk is less about Obama jerking Himself off [again] and more about the Israeli’s now feeling isolated and taking matters into their own hands. 

(5)   finally, the sovereign and bank debt crisis in EuropeEconomic conditions  continue to improve in Europe.  This progress likely moderates somewhat the risk of a crisis as rising tax revenue make sovereign debt service more manageable which in turn strengthens bank balance sheets [since a huge percentage of their assets are in their own country’s sovereign debt].

The wild card at the moment is that with the German elections out of the way, how will Merkel respond to the renewed effort by eurocrats to salvage the economies, governments and banks of southern Europe?  This doesn’t necessarily have to be a negative.  However, it is an unknown which will likely return to the front pages.

Bottom line:  the US economy continues to grow but at a sub par rate.  Fiscal policy remains a headwind and the latest battle over the budget/debt ceiling could have damaged business and consumer confidence sufficiently to impact an already below average economic growth rate. 

Monetary policy is a huge negative and is apt to get worse in as much as a lousy fiscal policy gives the Fed doves carte blanche to continue a lousy monetary policy.  This factor is the major risk to our forecast.  The longer QEInfinity goes on, the greater the risk that the transition from easy to tight money will cause severe dislocations.

Europe continues to emerge from a two year recession.  That is a positive in the sense that it increases the probability of our ‘muddling through’ scenario.  However, it remains a long road to unwind the enormous leverage of both sovereigns and banks.

This week’s data:

(1)                                  housing: weekly mortgage rose but purchase applications fell; October homebuilder confidence declined,

(2)                                  consumer: weekly retail sales were mixed; weekly jobless claims dropped less than anticipated,

(3)                                  industry: the October NY Fed manufacturing report was well below expectations while the Philadelphia Fed index was better than estimates,

(4)                                  macroeconomic: the latest Fed Beige Book report was little changed from its predecessor.


The Market-Disciplined Investing
           
  Technical

The Averages (DJIA 15399, S&P 1744) continue to trend higher, with the S&P leading the way.  It finished within its short term uptrend (1685-1839).  The Dow remained within its short term trading range (14190-15550).

Both of the Averages are well within their intermediate term (15092-20092, 1606-2192) and long term uptrends (4918-17000, 715-1800).

Volume on Friday was more robust than it has been for some time though breadth continued mixed.  The VIX was off again, closing near the lower boundary of its short term trading range.  A violation of that boundary would be a plus for stocks. 

I repeat the results of the Thursday night’s check of our internal indicator: in a Universe of 149 stocks, 43 are now at all time highs, 78 are not and 28 are too close to call.  In our limited sample, that is not great breadth.

The long Treasury was up slightly on Friday but remains within a short term trading range and an intermediate term downtrend.

GLD moved lower, after touching the upper boundary of its very short term downtrend on Thursday.  Its inability to penetrate this boundary says something about the strength of its bid.  It also closed below the upper boundaries of its short term and intermediate term downtrends.  Nothing to do here.

Bottom line:  the Averages are out of sync on a short term basis.  I continue to believe that this is a time to do nothing unless you are skilled trader.  The exception being if one of our stocks trades into its Sell Half Range, our Portfolios will act accordingly.
           
   Fundamental-A Dividend Growth Investment Strategy

The DJIA (15399) finished this week about 33.3% above Fair Value (11550) while the S&P (1744) closed 21.7% overvalued (1432).  Incorporated in that ‘Fair Value’ judgment is some sort of half assed attempt at getting fiscal policy under control, a botched Fed transition from easy to tight money, a historically low long term secular growth rate of the economy and a ‘muddle through’ scenario in Europe.

Most of the assumptions in the above forecast are tracking our expectations: (1) the economy continues to plod along, (2) the ruling class executed a perfect kick-the-can-down-the-road maneuver but only for three months and not after attaching the usual earmarks, i.e. something for them but nothing for you  and me, (3) Europe is improving the odds that it will  ‘muddle through’ and (4) the Fed, after blowing its initial attempt at a transition from easy to tight money, continues its relentless pursuit of having the most bloated central bank balance sheet in history, raising the prospect that its next attempt will end even worse.

Bottom line: the assumptions in our Economic Model haven’t changed; but I am increasingly concerned about the monetary policy component.  The longer that QEInfinity goes on, the more difficult task a transition becomes.  Indeed, at some point the fixed income market could lose enough confidence that it forces the Fed to begin to adjust policy and thereby removes as an option whatever well laid plans for transition the Fed has made. 

Hence, I remain confident in the Fair Values generated by our Valuation Model---meaning that stocks are overvalued.  So our Portfolios maintain their above average cash position.  Any move to higher levels would encourage more trimming of their equity positions.

Another great article from Lance Roberts (medium):

        This week, our Portfolios did nothing.

DJIA                                                    S&P

Current 2013 Year End Fair Value*                11600                                            1440
Fair Value as of 10/31/13                                 11550                                                  1432 
Close this week                                             15399                                                  1744

Over Valuation vs. 10/31 Close
              5% overvalued                                 12127                                                    1503
            10% overvalued                                 12705                                                   1575 
            15% overvalued                                    13282                                             1646
            20% overvalued                                 13860                                                    1718   
            25% overvalued                                   14437                                                  1790   
            30% overvalued                                   15015                                                  1861
            35% overvalued                                   15592                                                  1933
                       
Under Valuation vs.10/31 Close
            5% undervalued                             10972                                                      1360
10%undervalued                               10395                                                  1288   
15%undervalued                             9817                                                    1217

* Just a reminder that the Year End Fair Value number is based on the long term secular growth of the earning power of productive capacity of the US economy not the near term   cyclical influences.  The model is now accounting for somewhat below average secular growth for the next 3 to 5 years with somewhat higher inflation. 

The Portfolios and Buy Lists are up to date.


Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973.  His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder. Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns,  managing a risk arbitrage hedge fund and an investment banking boutique specializing in funding second stage private companies.  Through his involvement with Strategic Stock Investments, Steve hopes that his experience can help other investors build their wealth while avoiding tough lessons that he learned the hard way.








No comments:

Post a Comment