Wednesday, January 16, 2013

The Morning Call: More spending does not equal fiscal responsibility

-->
The Morning Call

1/16/13

The Market
           
    Technical

            The indices (DJIA 13534, S&P 1472) drifted higher yesterday, remaining within their short term uptrends (13051-13702, 1416-1485) and their intermediate term uptrends (13148-18148, 1391-1986).  They are very close to the September 2012 resistance highs (13682/1474). 

The next significant technical event will be whether or not the Averages can successfully challenge those resistance highs.  Given recent momentum, it seems likely that equities can move to higher levels; if so, the next identifiable resistance is at 14140/1576.  If not, a double top would be created and would likely presage a test of the lower boundaries of those short term uptrends.

Volume declined; breadth improved with the flow of funds indicator quite strong and on balance volume equally weak.  The VIX was up fractionally, finishing within its intermediate term downtrend.

GLD rose, closing within its short term downtrend and its intermediate term trading range.  However, it did manage to break above a very short term downtrend---a hopeful sign but not positive enough to prompt any action.

Bottom line:  both short and intermediate term uptrends remain solidly in tact.  However, the indices are very close to a significant resistance level (13682, 1474).  It seems most probable that these levels will be successfully breached; and if that occurs, our Portfolios will continue to lighten up.  If not, our Portfolios will do nothing, awaiting a test of the lower boundaries of the short term uptrends. 

            Yesterday’s GLD action was the first positive that we have had in a long time.  Whether or not it anticipates a turn in trend remains to seen.

            Bull market duration (short):

    Fundamental
    
     Headlines

            Yesterday’s US economic news was biased to the upside:  December PPI was lower than expected while December retail sales and November business sales and inventories were stronger than anticipated.  On the other hand, weekly retail sales were mixed and the NY Fed manufacturing index was considerably weaker than estimates.  All in all, this data supports our current economic outlook.

            Across the pond, German GDP was weaker than forecast---which is another strike against my hoped for mending of the EU economy.  In other news, the German central bank is shipping a majority of its gold currently domiciled in New York, London and Paris back to Germany.  There was a lot of chatter yesterday as to exactly what this means.  Consensus is that the German central bank is losing confidence in other central banks, which, if true, is not a good omen for a stable global financial system.

            Draghi has more to do (medium):

            And (medium):

            The EU economic indicators are turning dismal again (medium):

            And finally (short):

            Of course, the debt ceiling/sequestration/spending dialogue continued with no language of compromise; although we are getting a hint of what the solution might look like from the current Hurricane Sandy relief bill. To wit, lots of unrelated pork. So anyone believing that a move toward fiscal responsibility is in the offing has to explain to me how that can happen given the pork spending that was added to the recent tax increase and Sandy relief legislation.

            Is big deficit reduction dead? (medium):

            And if it is not, what happens next ? (medium):

Bottom line: ‘our strategy remains at odds with a Market that seems eager to value stocks above what our Model considers Fair.  Clearly, this makes my stomach churn and keeps me constantly challenging the assumptions in our Models.  Certainly, I can get  valuations higher but it necessitates that our elected representatives produce a budget that is far more fiscally responsible than anything they have done in almost two decades.  They could do it; but it seems a stretch to bet money on that assumption.  As a result, I am more comfortable accepting the opportunity cost of not participating in any further price rise in order to avoid the risk that prices could quickly retreat to 5% to 10% undervalued if our political class stumbles on debt ceiling/sequestration/spending cut problem.’ 

            The latest from Bill Fleckenstein (medium):

            The latest from John Mauldin (long):

            The latest from Jim Grant:

     Subscriber Alert

            The stock price of Apple (AAPL) has traded below the upper boundary of its Buy Value Range.  Accordingly, it is being Added to the Aggressive Growth Buy List.  No shares will be purchased at this time.




Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Strategic Stock Investments is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.

No comments:

Post a Comment